Sorry, Twitter cannot be contacted. Try again soon.

Political Stuff
Write or Call your LA State Senators:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=LA

Click on Web Form to send a message.

Write or Call your LA State Representatives:

http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml#la

Map of LA Congressional Districts

List of all Senators and how to contact them

List of all US Representatives and how to contact them

 



Toddler in Debt! Thanks Uncle Sam! PDF Print E-mail
 
Ray Stevens - We the People PDF Print E-mail
 
David Vitter on ClimateGate PDF Print E-mail

From an email David Vitter sent on December 18, 2009:

Dear  Friend,

As you are probably aware, what has now been  dubbed “Climategate,” has quickly turned into an international scientific scandal  involving the world’s preeminent climate change research center for global  warming.

Last month, either a whistleblower or a hacker  downloaded and released more than 1,000 emails and internal documents from the  Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia in the UK.   This research facility is the nerve center for the United Nations  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and its scientists are the  primary authors of the UN’s global warming research and temperature data for  most modeling used at the international level, as well as cited here in the  U.S. by agencies and White House officials.

The emails and other released data appear to  implicate professors at some of the U.S.’s premier universities in a  coordinated effort to achieve the IPCC agenda rather than provide dispassionate  scientific data .  A review of the emails is illuminating.  In them,  scientists appear to advise each other on how to smooth over data so as not to  compromise the favored hypothesis, to discuss ways to keep opposing views out  of leading journals, and to give tips on how to “hide the decline” of  temperature in certain inconvenient data.

It’s also important to note that the data and research  at both the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA are not independent of the CRU.  As to date, NASA  has not been forthcoming with its own temperature data and records and has  stonewalled a request for data under the Freedom of Information Act  (FOIA).  At least one researcher has also found serious problems with  temperature data in Australia.  The full extent of the implications of "Climategate"  will not be known for awhile as years of  modeling and lost or destroyed data must be sifted through in an attempt to uncover the full story.

U.S. climate policy  – as well as  President Obama’s proposed new regulation of carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act and the international climate change treaty being proposed at the Copenhagen Conference today  – is based on  the “science” from the IPCC research and the authors of the now public emails  and data.  And because the EPA has proposed to regulate CO2 emissions on the  basis of the now questionable IPCC reports and data, I am working with Senate  and House colleagues to investigate the nature and extent of the inconvenient  revelations now made available.  I will be sure to keep you up to date on  our work.

Sincerely,

David Vitter
U.S.  Senator

 
Miss Me Yet? PDF Print E-mail
 
THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER PDF Print E-mail
OLD VERSION:

The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
      
Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed.
      
The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.   
      
MORAL OF THE STORY: Be responsible for yourself!
      
      
MODERN VERSION:
      
The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.
 
The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
 
Read more...
 
David Vitter on Cap and Trade Bill PDF Print E-mail

From: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Sent: Tue 7/28/09 11:19 AM
To:     Mark Duck

Dear  Friend,

In September, the U.S. Senate is expected to  resume debate on comprehensive climate change legislation – already passed in  the House of Representatives – to limit energy use in the United States.   As in previous versions, this legislation focuses on the idea of cap-and-trade,  or as I like to call it, “cap-and-tax,” as a mechanism to reduce carbon  emissions.

In the history of ideas to come out of  Washington, this is amongst the worst.  Cap-and-Trade would set an  arbitrary “cap” on carbon emissions, and require emitters to later purchase  “credits” to emit greenhouse gases.  Consequently, this would increase the  cost of everything from gas and food to electricity and water bills.  The  cost of producing every agricultural and manufactured product in the United  States would also exponentially increase, forcing carbon-emitting manufacturers  and businesses to look to move their operations – and the jobs they provide to  Americans – overseas to countries without such burdensome regulations.   With America already in the grips of a still-worsening recession, both the  short and long term implications for our economy would be devastating.

Read more...
 
Mary Landrieu on Cap and Trade Bill PDF Print E-mail
July 16, 2009

Dear Mr. Duck:

Thank you for contacting me regarding the recent “cap and trade” proposal to reduce greenhouse gases that was passed in the U.S. House of Representatives. I share your concerns regarding this proposal and appreciate hearing from you.

The cap and trade proposal is intended to limit the amount of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, in an effort to slow the effects of climate change. In theory, this proposal would set a limit, or cap, on greenhouse gas emissions. Each covered utility, oil company, and manufacturing facility would be given allowances based on past emissions or some other formula. Those companies that emit less carbon dioxide than permitted by their allowances could sell the excess to those that do not (the “trade” part of “cap and trade”). Over time, the cap would be ratcheted down, requiring greater cuts in emissions. This is all in an effort to reduce the likelihood of violent changes in the earth’s climate that could imperil lives and businesses, such as sea-level rise, violent storms, droughts, and the like.
Read more...
 
Charlie Melancon on Cap and Trade Bill PDF Print E-mail
July 13, 2009

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Duck:

Thank you for taking the time to contact me. I appreciate your concern regarding the issue of climate change and its accompanying legislation.

The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, as introduced by Rep. Henry Waxman, takes a comprehensive approach to the energy and environment issues facing our country. The U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 2454 on June 26, 2009 by a vote of 219-212.

While I commend the bill's intent to reduce pollution and curb climate change, I was not able to support its passage. I have seen the effects of climate change, such as stronger storms and rising sea levels, and these changes threaten our homes and way of life. However, I believe we can find a practical approach to address these issues without putting our economy at risk.
Read more...
 
Write or Call your Representative PDF Print E-mail

Let you Senator and Congressman know how you feel on looming legislation such as:

Cap and Trade Energy Legislation

Government Run Health Care Legislation

Write or Call your LA State Senators:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=LA

Click on Web Form to send a message.

Write or Call your LA State Representatives:

http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW_by_State.shtml#la

Map of LA Congressional Districts

List of all Senators and how to contact them

List of all US Representatives and how to contact them

 

 


Bicolor template supported by Naturalife Greenworld